Personally, I’ve always felt extremely attracted to chaos
theory; small changes in a dynamic system at one level will reverberate and
amplify in unanticipated ways throughout interconnected levels of the system.
The popular cultural idea of this is
captured in the concept of the “butterfly effect” coined by Edward
Lorenz, whose wings set in motion a series of events that cascade into
major and seemingly unrelated outcomes (like affecting the weather a continent
away) .
I also fall under the belief (illusion?) that because
scientific research, through sound principles, can illuminate causality between
two or more things, it must have equal explanatory power for future causality.
Take for instance the weather. Even if we can pull apart, examine and
understand everything that led to a particular tornado’s occurrence we cannot predict
that under the exact same set of circumstances another tornado would even
form. It’s not a matter of some
measurement that might have been missed or some possible unknown “X factor”,
it’s simply that a small change in the beginning or initial stages of a system
impact later stages in different ways under the same exact conditions. There is
no way to completely predict the exact outcome. A set or series of probable
outcomes; yes, but an exact outcomes – never.
How does this relate to one’s own career or choice of future
career paths? The traditional model of career advising seeks to help one become
self-aware through a series of tools and instruments that help delineate one’s
preferences, interests and values – a “best fit” model. Understand a person’s
interests, values, and preferences, and then seek to match them with an
occupation that best relates. We can call this the modernist approach or
positivist approach. The postmodern
approach to career advising entails having the advisee construct meaning from
past experiences (work, life, family, spirituality) and thereby bring to light
a pattern (life theme, map, life meaning, etc) that can then be aligned with a particular
career path. In a very tiny nutshell, these two concepts have been the major
theories that have propelled the career development ideology for many decades.
The authors of the book propose a new theory that integrates
both of these concepts in a way that values both of their contributions. “Open
systems thinking” captures the general idea of a chaos theory of careers by arguing that
systems have constituent parts contained in a dynamic system where boundaries
are ill-defined and impacts from chance encounters, events and circumstances
will impact these parts in unknown ways. Looking at your own career
development. What unknowns arose that you could not have possibly anticipated and
how have your decisions and your pathways diverged from even your best laid plans and
goals? Ultimately, we can incorporate chaos and the unknown into our career planning and we should seek to embrace this - not "factor out" or insulate ourselves from the vagaries of life's chances.
No comments:
Post a Comment